27.11.2014
Source: PNG Attitude
Where to for Bougainville? A polemic, a plea & a plan
by CHRIS OVERLAND
 

 Bougainville Manifesto cover
Bougainville  Manifesto by Leonard Fong Roka, Pukpuk Publishing, 88pp,  ISBN-10:1502917459. Available from Amazon: hard copy $US6.00; Kindle  $US2.98
LEONARD Fong Roka comes from Panguna on Bougainville.  Between 2013 and 2014 he wrote a series of articles about Bougainville  that first appeared on the PNG Attitude website.
The essays  outline the history of Bougainville, including the civil war in the  1980-90s, and suggest a way forward towards eventual independence from  Papua New Guinea.
Bougainville Manifesto is many things: a  history, a polemic, a plea and a plan of sorts. In it, Roka writes with  considerable passion about his island home.
He asserts that,  prior to the colonial era, Bougainville was part of a Solomon Islands  nation state that had been in existence for at least 30,000 years. There  is, in his judgement, compelling historic, socio-cultural and  linguistic evidence to support this claim.
Roka rejects outright  any idea that Bougainville is logically part of Papua New Guinea, which  he regards as being an abstract creation of European colonialism, that  was itself an expression of the larger "scramble for Empire" which  characterised European politics during much of late 19th and early 20th  century.
Roka's writing is especially passionate and eloquent  when he outlines the destruction of Bougainvillean culture and  traditional social structures that was a result of the European takeover  of the island.
He believes that colonialism rendered  Bougainvilleans virtually powerless in the face of a more  technologically advanced culture: second class citizens in their own  land.  This opinion is consistent with what is now probably the  generally accepted view about the impact of colonialism on the  colonised.
Bougainville's demise as a long standing self  governing entity laid the ground work for the future disaster that was  to consume it.
It was arbitrarily included in a country created  by imperial decision makers who had never seen it and knew nothing of  its history or ethnic origins.
Its people saw the systematic  destruction of their culture and traditions at the hands of the colonial  power and were reduced, in Roka's mind, to near slavery, functionally  if not actually dispossessed of their land.
Bougainville remained  a colonial backwater until the discovery of vast copper resources near  Panguna. This suddenly elevated it to the most resource rich and  economically important province in the proposed new nation of Papua New  Guinea.
The Australian colonial administration was determined  that a vast copper mine should be developed so as to provide a source of  income to PNG once it achieved independence.
The development  went ahead without any real regard for the wishes of the legitimate  traditional land owners at Panguna, who saw little benefit from the  subsequent exploitation and destruction of their land.
For Roka,  Bougainville was a parting gift from Australia to the newly created  government of Papua New Guinea, a government dominated by "redskins" who  had no regard at all for the needs or aspirations of Bougainville's  people.
The subsequent collapse of the Panguna venture brought  about by the armed uprising led by Francis Ona is now well known, at  least to those with an interest in PNG and the South Pacific generally.
Less  well known is the complex web of relationships, described by Roka, that  under lay the uprising and which helped propel Bougainville into a  period of bloody civil war which, by Roka's estimate, directly or  indirectly caused the deaths of anywhere between 10,000 and 20,000  people.
Somehow this very brutal and destructive civil war seemed  to pass largely unnoticed by the rest of the world. This is probably a  commentary on the lack of importance much of the world attaches to the  usually very small and poor countries of the South Pacific and Oceania.
In  considering where Bougainville might go in the future, Roka rejects any  idea that it should stay as a part of PNG. He is adamant that PNG is a  colonial construct to which Bougainville has no historic, cultural or  ethnic ties.
His strong desire is that it should become an independent entity, perhaps within a loose federation of the Solomon Islands.
It  is his great fear that, in the forthcoming plebiscite about the future  of the island, Bougainvilleans' sense of their own identity and  uniqueness has been so compromised by the events of the last century  that they may not have the will to grasp perhaps their last chance to  seize back control of their destiny.
He is deeply worried about  what he describes as the "redskinisation" of his island and the apparent  lack of strong leadership from Bougainvilleans in elected office.
Roka's  own vision for the future is of a sort of communalist, grass roots  based system of governance that, to some degree at least, reflects the  traditional structures of Bougainvillean society.
He advocates a  strongly protectionist economic structure, an education system overtly  oriented towards teaching about Bougainville's unique culture and  traditions and is attracted to the social democratic governance models  found in Scandinavia, with their strong emphasis on equity and fairness.  Whether such a model can be successfully transplanted into Bougainville  is a moot point.
This is a useful book for anyone wishing to  understand how Bougainville came to be in the situation that now  prevails. Roka expresses what might reasonably be characterised as the  views of a Bougainvillean "nationalist", presenting a very different  idea about what the future should be when compared to that of the PNG  government.
If Roka's views are representative of a significant  majority of Bougainvilleans, then the result of the forthcoming  referendum on the island's future will see it moving towards  independence. This will present huge challenges to both Bougainvilleans  and PNG.
Even if his views represent those of a small but  significant minority, then it is entirely conceivable that any  referendum will achieve little other than to polarise opinion on  Bougainville and, perhaps, incite a resurgence of the violence that  bedevilled it in the recent past.
Whatever the future may hold  for Bougainville, I fervently hope that it is a peaceful and prosperous  one. Its people deserve nothing less.